Tensions
run high at final Black Mesa DEIS hearing
Rebecca Schubert
The Observer
FLAGSTAFF-Gathering from communities
across northern Arizona and beyond people of the many
nations including the Hopi, Navajo and U.S. came together
to learn and discuss the Office of Surface Mining's
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The public
meeting was the final in a series of 12 held by the
U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Surface Mining
(OSM) administrators across northern Arizona.
Approximately 100 individuals were in
attendance at the Little America ballroom to share their
view of the Black Mesa Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) issued Nov. 22, 2006.
The DEIS includes the initial analysis
of the potential impacts of reopening the Mohave Generating
Station in Laughlin, Nev. and returning the Black Mesa
Project to operation. Within the DEIS, which is more
than 750 pages in length, OSM suggests three alternatives
including:
1. Alternative A, the "Preferred
Alternative"-Approval of the Life of Mine Revision
and All Associated Components of the Black Mesa Project.
This alternative would add 19,111 acres to the 44,073
existing permit area. A coal-slurry pipeline totaling
more than 273 miles would be reconstructed inside the
earth through which coal would be moved from the mine
to the generating station. To transport this coal, 6,000
acre feet of water per year would be withdrawn from
the C-Aquifer; withdrawal from the N-Aquifer would also
be permitted as necessary. In addition to this amount,
5,600 acre feet per year would be available to the Hopi
and Navajo Tribes for purchase. The proposed well field
is near Leupp. These operations would continue through
2026 with reclamation anticipated through 2038.
2. Alternative B-Conditional Approval
of the Life of Mine Revision Without Approval of the
Black Mesa Mining Operations, Coal-Slurry Pipeline,
and C Aquifer Water-Supply System. This alternative
would include expansion, but omit the Black Mesa mining
operation, coal-slurry pipeline preparation plant and
pipeline, coal washing system and C-aquifer water supply
system. Operations at the currently-operating Navajo
Generating Station near Page would operate through 2026
using N-aquifer water with reclamation and public uses
through 2038.
3. Alternative C-Disapproval of the
Life of Mine Revision (No Action). Under this alternative,
unmined coal resource areas of the operation would not
be incorporated in the expanded permit area of the Black
Mesa complex and would not be mined. The infrastructure
for the operation would be promptly reclaimed and none
of the Mohave Generating Station improvements of Alternative
A would be made. As in Alternative B, Navajo Generating
Station operations would continue through 2026, and
2038, respectively.
The meeting began with an audio-video
presentation, which was to be followed by a period of
personal questions directed at OSM officials individually.
However, the crowd of people requested an open forum
in which officials would address the group at large.
The speakers from the audience explained that many of
the questions were similar in nature, and to save time,
it would be most advantageous to address the crowd as
a whole.
OSM officials declined the request.
"This is not a public hearing,"
OSM official Rick Holbrook said. "The purpose of
this process is not to discuss the merits of this...it's
not to discuss the political processes used."
"I want my voice to be heard. I
want my concerns to be heard orally," said one
audience member.
A crowd of approximately 50 people jumped
to their feet and began demanding a change in the meeting's
format.
"Clearly this format isn't working,"
said Andy Bessler, the Sierra Club's associate regional
representative of the Environmental Partnership Program.
"What's the benefit of using this format? This
format clearly doesn't work."
With the continued refusal, the crowd
began to chant "Unfair, Unfair."
"If you think this is unfair, then
don't be here," Holbrook said.
Holbrook and OSM leader Dennis Winterringer
backed away from the crowd and invited them again to
ask questions on an individual basis or have their comments
recorded by one of the two typists who were taking written
comments. Winterringer and Holbrook then moved to the
opposite side of the room.
"This is a direct assault on citizens
here. This is a way to make a meeting not happen,"
said another crowd member.
The crowd then approached the typists
and began to recite comments before the entire audience
so that everyone in attendance could hear, and so that
each comment would simultaneously be typed and become
part of the OSM record.
"I want it noted in the public
record the inadequacies of this public hearing, the
fact that I want to be able to address not only OSM,
but also the Navajo Tribal officials, SRP, and I don't
know where they are in this type of format. I have to
go look at someone's little nametag and hunt them down
to be able to get my questions answered. So this format
is not working," Enei Begaye said.
Through these actions, it became clear
that the majority of people in attendance were in opposition
to the DEIS, as well as the Preferred Alternative.
In addition to the multiple individuals
voicing opinions against the DEIS, the public hearing
schedule and the meeting format, were those unfamiliar
with the DEIS, as well as those in support of it.
Becky Daggett of Friends of Flagstaff's
Future was there to learn of the DEIS. According to
Daggett, her group has yet to discuss the impacts of
the Black Mesa mining proposals. Daggett was in attendance
to understand the issues surrounding the proposals and
deliver the information to her group.
Also there as an interpreter of the
events, but also in support of the Preferred Alternative
and a OSM liaison was Jerry R. Sekayumptewa, Hopi Tribal
Council Member from the village of Mishongonvi. Sekayumptewa
explained that he and his village were not affected
negatively by the OSM schedule, as they are currently
in a social calendar cycle.
"I can only speak for Second Mesa,"
he said. "My job is to be here, to record what
is happening and take this information back to the people.
The way this affects people depends on the village and
which cycle they are in."
Sekayumptewa, who is part of the Hopi
Water and Energy Committee voiced his support of the
use of the C-Aquifer and N-Aquifer and the reopening
of the Mohave Generating station due to the dollars
it may bring to the Hopi nation.
"We've been drawn into this capitalistic
society and we can't get away from it," he said.
Sekayumptewa said that in his younger years he most
likely would have been in opposition to the mining and
water use. However, he has come to believe that someday
all the resources in the Hopi community will be used
and extinguished.
"There's nothing I can do about
it," he said.
In contrast, former Hopi Chairman and
founder of the Black Mesa Trust Vernon Masayesva spoke
vehemently against the use of the C and N Aquifers and
explained the mass opposition to the pipeline and reopening
of the Mohave Generating station in many Hopi communities.
"Tonight there are people praying
in the Kivas for rain to recharge the aquifers as they
have done for generations," Masayesva said.
The public meetings have now concluded,
and Holbrook assured those in attendance, as well as
the Navajo Hopi Observer that no further meetings would
be held. Even so, individuals have until Feb. 6 to submit
comments on the DEIS to OSM.
Further information concerning the DEIS
and the proposed plan can be accessed at: http://www.wrcc.osmre.gov/WR/BlackMesaEIS.htm
Questions and comments can be directed
to Dennis Winterringer, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, P.O. Box 46667, Denver, CO, 80201-6667;
by phone at 303-844-1400 ext. 1440; or by email at BMKEIS@osmre.gov
To learn more about Black Mesa Trust
visit www.blackmesawatercoalition.org or call (928)
213-9760.
Related Links:
• Black
Mesa Draft EIS
• Black
Mesa Trust
|