Western Shoshone
Payments Challenged
by Ryan Slattery, Correspondent
Indian
Country Today
Originally Published 16 December 2003
CRESCENT
VALLEY, Nev. - The Western Shoshone have found an ally in U.S.
Rep. Raul Grijalva to join their near half-century long land
battle with the federal government. The Arizona congressman is
taking the Department of Interior to task asking some hard-line
questions and requesting bundles of documents related to land
and treaty rights directly connected with the current
distribution bill which considers one-time payments to the
tribe.
In a
four-page letter, dated Nov. 17 and addressed to Interior
Secretary Gale Norton, Grijalva, D-Ariz. asked the department to
cite the law the government used to take title to Western
Shoshone land, called for the release of reports justifying the
agency’s recent treatment of the tribe and demanded
information regarding any meetings or communications the agency
has had with special interests eyeing the land for potential
energy development.
Although
Grijalva said the letter isn’t meant to be accusatory or
demanding in nature its tone is quite clear. He wants everything
laid out on the table so Congress can make an informed decision
on H.R. 884, better known as the "Western Shoshone
Distribution Bill." Grijalva said he hopes at least to get
some "factual answers" to all the questions he raises
in his letter.
"The
process wasn’t as democratic as it should have been,"
Grijalva said. "There has not been a full disclosure of the
facts."
Passage
of the bill would settle a long simmering land claims case and
award $145 million to Western Shoshone members as reparations
for the federal government’s taking of their ancestral land.
It’s estimated that tribal members would receive approximately
$30,000 apiece. Grijalva pointed out in his letter that at 24
million acres the payment equates to roughly "15 cents an
acre."
But
tribal members remain divided over whether to accept a one-time
payment from the government or continue seeking ownership of the
land. Carrie and Mary Dann are standing firm in their beliefs
and fighting to keep control of their homeland.
Citing
the 1863 Treaty of Ruby Valley a faction of the tribe has filed
a federal lawsuit and continues to seek title to a swath of land
- more than 60 million acres - that stretches across the Great
Basin area most of which is in Nevada.
"The
Western Shoshone never agreed to sell their land," said
Julie Fishel, a spokeswoman for the tribal defense project.
Among
Grijalva’s many concerns he started his letter by questioning
how the U.S. ended tribal ownership of the land saying that
"gradual encroachment is not a legally valid method of
taking or extinguishing title and the Western Shoshone have
never sold, ceded or in any manner transferred title."
He went
on to question whether the Interior ever made a seriously effort
to negotiate with tribal leaders to resolve the matter and later
asked the agency to explain its conflicting testimony before
both Congressional and Senate committees.
Grijalva
claimed that officials told a senate committee in 2002 that the
Treaty was in "full force" with the exception of a
section regarding land boundaries, but then 10 months later told
the House Resources Committee that "there was a question as
to whether the Treaty ever recognized land rights."
The
Arizona congressman also asked for documents justifying why the
Bureau of Land Management continues aerial surveillance of
Western Shoshone ranchers and asked the agency to provide
details on all livestock seizures and raids that occurred on
tribal lands.
A
little over a year ago the BLM confiscated 227 cattle belonging
to the Danns and followed that with the horse roundup in
February that the sisters claim led to the deaths of 47 mares
and foals at Fish Creek Ranch. The BLM said the Danns have been
illegally grazing cattle and horses on the range for more than
30 years and owe the government $3 million in grazing fees.
Fishel
said the Grijalva letter helps shine a spotlight on an issue
many classify as just a "range war" between the
Dann-led Western Shoshone and the federal government but the
ties, she said, run much deeper.
Fishel
said she hopes other members of Congress back Grijalva and seek
the truth which she believes will show a "cozy relationship
between federal agencies and corporations."
"Are
there deals being cut," Fishel asked. "People are
beginning to look at the Department of Interior for
answers."
To
that, Grijalva called for the release of all material and
communications the department has had with third party
"industries, individuals or companies" with
investments or business development plans within the Ruby Valley
treaty area especially those involved with interests in mining,
energy, water or nuclear.
Ironically,
the same week of Grijalva’s letter, the Interior Department
and BLM held a scoping meeting in Las Vegas to discuss
alternative energy on public lands in preparation of putting
together an Environment Impact Statement. It was one of five
such meetings scattered throughout the west.
At the
meeting Nevada was identified as having many of the best places
to tap into geothermal activity. Officials also pointed out that
more than half of the 62 applications being considered for
construction of wind farms on federal land are for sites within
the state and many fall within the disputed Ruby Valley area.
Rebecca
Watson, the Interior’s assistant secretary for Land and
Minerals Management told the few in attendance that,
"Nevada sits at an energy crossroads" and that the
state will "definitely have a role to play in our nation’s
alternative energy policy."
Reprinted
as an historical reference document under the Fair Use doctrine
of international copyright law. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
|